2000 Ford Equator vs. 1976 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1976 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1976 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Holden Belmont weights approximately 117 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Holden Belmont (228 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1976 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1976 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Equator | Belmont |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 2834 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 228 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1325 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2830 mm |
