2000 Ford Equator vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 296 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Equator | 616 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1586 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 912 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2480 mm |
