2000 Ford Equator vs. 1978 Skoda L
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 383 kg more than 1978 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1978 Skoda L | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | Equator | L |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1046 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 825 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2410 mm |
