2000 Ford Equator vs. 1984 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Reliant Scimitar (133 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Reliant Scimitar should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Reliant Scimitar weights approximately 92 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Reliant Scimitar (206 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1984 Reliant Scimitar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1984 Reliant Scimitar has manual transmission. 1984 Reliant Scimitar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 1984 Reliant Scimitar | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | Equator | Scimitar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 2792 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 206 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2640 mm |