2000 Ford Equator vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault 19 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (63 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 113 kg more than 1992 Renault 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault 19. (118 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault 19. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1992 Renault 19 has manual transmission. 1992 Renault 19 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1992 Renault 19 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Equator | 19 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1870 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1095 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2630 mm |
