2000 Ford Equator vs. 1993 Renault Safrane
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Safrane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Safrane would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Renault Safrane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1993 Renault Safrane. (106 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Safrane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Renault Safrane weights approximately 162 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Safrane. (155 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Safrane. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1993 Renault Safrane has manual transmission. 1993 Renault Safrane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1993 Renault Safrane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Equator | Safrane |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1370 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2770 mm |
