2000 Ford Equator vs. 1996 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lancia Kappa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lancia Kappa would be higher. At 1,998 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Kappa (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 302 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lancia Kappa (186 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1996 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1996 Lancia Kappa has manual transmission. 1996 Lancia Kappa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1996 Lancia Kappa | |
| Make | Ford | Lancia |
| Model | Equator | Kappa |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1510 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2710 mm |
