2000 Ford Equator vs. 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,378 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser (176 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 762 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser (303 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser has manual transmission. 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Equator | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 3378 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 303 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1970 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2680 mm |