2000 Ford Equator vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (120 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 167 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 160 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1998 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 1998 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1998 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Equator | 75 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1769 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1375 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2750 mm |
