2000 Ford Equator vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (112 HP @ 2000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 392 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2002 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Equator | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 2184 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 270 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1600 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2540 mm |