2000 Ford Equator vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Subaru Outback (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Subaru Outback weights approximately 402 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Subaru Outback (288 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2002 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Equator | Outback |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 2998 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 288 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2660 mm |