2000 Ford Equator vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 128 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (141 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Equator | 2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 141 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1080 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2500 mm |