2000 Ford Equator vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 4,266 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S (276 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 747 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S (400 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2003 Mercedes-Benz S | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Equator | S |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 4266 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1955 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2860 mm |
