2000 Ford Equator vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 2,350 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander (138 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 262 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander (214 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Equator | Outlander |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 2350 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 214 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2640 mm |
