2000 Ford Equator vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo weights approximately 172 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo (186 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo has manual transmission. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Equator | Vaneo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 186 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1380 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2910 mm |