2000 Ford Equator vs. 2005 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (321 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1062 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (370 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2005 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | Equator | Sierra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 5965 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2270 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 3650 mm |
