2000 Ford Equator vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 507 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (434 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Equator | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 4605 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1715 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2730 mm |
