2000 Ford Equator vs. 2008 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 17 kg more than 2008 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 3. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 3. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2008 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Equator | 3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1191 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2650 mm |
