2000 Ford Equator vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 185 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (320 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Equator | Commander |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 3701 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 320 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1393 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2790 mm |