2000 Ford Equator vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer (150 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 332 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer has manual transmission. 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Equator | Lancer |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 146 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1540 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2640 mm |