2000 Ford Equator vs. 2010 Audi S5
To start off, 2010 Audi S5 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi S5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi S5 (354 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi S5 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi S5 weights approximately 542 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi S5 (440 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2010 Audi S5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2010 Audi S5 has manual transmission. 2010 Audi S5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2010 Audi S5 | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Equator | S5 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 4200 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 354 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1750 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2751 mm |
