2000 Ford Equator vs. 2011 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 341 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado (258 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2011 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2011 Chevrolet Colorado has manual transmission. 2011 Chevrolet Colorado will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 2011 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Equator | Colorado |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 2901 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 258 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1549 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2830 mm |