2000 Ford Equator vs. 2012 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 262 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi (230 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2012 Suzuki Kizashi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 2012 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Equator | Kizashi |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 2400 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 230 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2700 mm |