2000 Ford Equator vs. 2013 Aston Martin DB9
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 (470 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 342 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 607 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 (601 Nm) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2013 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2013 Aston Martin DB9 | |
| Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
| Model | Equator | DB9 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 5900 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 470 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 601 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1815 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2745 mm |
