2000 Ford Equator vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 625 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Equator | CTS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1833 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2880 mm |
