2000 Ford Equator vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (572 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 444 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (754 Nm) has 594 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2013 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Equator | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 6200 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 572 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 754 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2852 mm |
