2000 Ford Equator vs. 2013 Kia SOUL
To start off, 2013 Kia SOUL is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia SOUL (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia SOUL should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 22 kg more than 2013 Kia SOUL.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Kia SOUL (167 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2013 Kia SOUL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2013 Kia SOUL has manual transmission. 2013 Kia SOUL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2013 Kia SOUL | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Equator | SOUL |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 1600 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1186 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2550 mm |
