2000 Ford Escape vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 2000 Ford Escape is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Escape weights approximately 336 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 2000 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Escape has automatic transmission and 1955 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1955 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Escape will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Escape | 1955 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Ford | Riley |
| Model | Escape | RM A |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1236 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2870 mm |
