2000 Ford Escape vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2000 Ford Escape is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Escape (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 2000 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Escape (169 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Escape | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Escape | 66 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.8 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |