2000 Ford Escort vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Escort. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Escort would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Ford Escort. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Escort.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Escort. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Escort.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Escort | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Escort | Matrix |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 50 L |