2000 Ford Excursion vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2000 Ford Excursion is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Excursion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Excursion (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Excursion should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Excursion weights approximately 2070 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Excursion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Excursion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Excursion | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
Model | Excursion | Tiger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Size | 5406 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 3210 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2050 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 167 L | 27 L |