2000 Ford Excursion vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Excursion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Excursion would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Excursion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Excursion (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Excursion should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Excursion weights approximately 1865 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Excursion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Excursion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Excursion (474 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Excursion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Excursion | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Excursion | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5406 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 474 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 3210 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 167 L | 80 L |
