2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1951 Jaguar MK V
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1951 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1951 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 400 kg more than 2000 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 1951 Jaguar MK V | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Falcon | MK V |
Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 3483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2900 mm |