2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1952 Renault Colorale
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Colorale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Colorale would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1952 Renault Colorale. (45 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1952 Renault Colorale. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Renault Colorale weights approximately 335 kg more than 2000 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 1952 Renault Colorale | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | Colorale |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 45 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2670 mm |