2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1955 Opel Rekord
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1955 Opel Rekord. (44 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1955 Opel Rekord.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Falcon | 1955 Opel Rekord | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Falcon | Rekord |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
