2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Falcon | Aronde |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 90 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2450 mm |