2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (268 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Falcon | 1964 Holden EK | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Falcon | EK |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 65 HP |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
