2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1976 Renault 15
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault 15 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (268 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1976 Renault 15. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1976 Renault 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 333 kg more than 1976 Renault 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Renault 15. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Renault 15.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 1976 Renault 15 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | 15 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |