2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1982 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Camry. (106 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 175 kg more than 1982 Toyota Camry. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Camry. (166 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 1982 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Falcon | Camry |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 166 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2610 mm |