2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 123 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Sundance.
Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Falcon | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Falcon | Sundance |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2470 mm |
