2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Incas
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Incas. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Incas would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1986 Oldsmobile Incas. (230 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1986 Oldsmobile Incas.
Because 1986 Oldsmobile Incas is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Incas will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Oldsmobile Incas has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Oldsmobile Incas will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 1986 Oldsmobile Incas | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Falcon | Incas |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 230 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2880 mm |