2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1990 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (268 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 123 kg more than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 1990 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Falcon | Sundance |
Year Released | 2000 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2470 mm |