2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 370 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (118 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Falcon | 1990 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Falcon | Clio |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1990 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4940 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 23.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
