2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (268 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 323 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (187 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 1993 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 187 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 83.5 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |