2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1996 Ford Fiesta
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Fiesta weights approximately 47 kg more than 2000 Ford Falcon.
Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 1996 Ford Fiesta | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Falcon | Fiesta |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 62 L |