2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1996 Italdesign Formula 4
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (268 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. (147 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4.
Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. (187 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Falcon | 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Italdesign |
| Model | Falcon | Formula 4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 147 HP |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2550 mm |
