2000 Ford Falcon vs. 2003 Lada 2123
To start off, 2003 Lada 2123 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2003 Lada 2123. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2003 Lada 2123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lada 2123 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2000 Ford Falcon.
Because 2003 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Lada 2123. (170 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Lada 2123.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Falcon | 2003 Lada 2123 | |
| Make | Ford | Lada |
| Model | Falcon | 2123 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4940 cc | 1690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2460 mm |
