2000 Ford Falcon vs. 2003 Noble M14
To start off, 2003 Noble M14 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Noble M14 (396 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2000 Ford Falcon. (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Noble M14 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 125 kg more than 2003 Noble M14.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Noble M14 (522 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Falcon. (420 Nm). This means 2003 Noble M14 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 2003 Noble M14 | |
Make | Ford | Noble |
Model | Falcon | M14 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 396 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 522 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2440 mm |