2000 Ford Falcon vs. 2003 Proton 400

To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 305 kg more than 2003 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications: