2000 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2000 Ford Falcon. (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 195 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Falcon | F-150 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 610 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.4:1 |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1323 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 95 L |